Safe harbour for directors of struggling companies

Australia’s insolvent trading laws impose harsh penalties on directors of companies that trade where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the company is insolvent.  Criminal and civil penalties can apply personally including penalties of up to $200,000, compensation proceedings by creditors or liquidators, and where dishonesty has been involved, up to 5 years in prison.

New harbour provisions give directors some ‘wiggle room’ where they are attempting to restructure a company outside of a formal insolvency process.

Under the new rules, directors will only be liable for debts incurred while the company was insolvent if they were not developing or taking a course of action that at the time was reasonably likely to lead to a better outcome for the company than proceeding to immediate administration or liquidation.  The explanatory memorandum to the amending legislation however clearly states that “hope is not a strategy” when it comes to assessing the reasonableness of the actions taken by directors.

 

Tolerance levels of the new laws

The new laws give directors a safe harbour from the civil insolvent trading provisions of the Corporations Act but only where the company is up to date with employee entitlements including superannuation, and has met its tax obligations-normally the first thing to go in distressed companies.

The amendments create a safe harbour for “honest and diligent company directors from personal liability for insolvent trading if they are pursuing a restructure outside formal insolvency.”  Directors who merely take a passive approach or allow the company to continue trading as usual during severe financial difficulty, or whose recovery plans are “fanciful”, will not be protected, or to appoint an administrator or liquidator within a reasonable time period of identifying severe financial difficulty will also lose the benefit of the safe harbour.

 

What does all this mean?

To utilise the safe harbour, directors will need to demonstrate that they took action that “could lead to a better outcome” such as:

 

  • Accessing the right information to make timely and informed decisions – engage professional advice to assess the company’s solvency and provide the right information at meaningful time periods. As soon as the company’s solvency is questionable, steps should be taken to ensure further debts are not incurred.  The result of this assessment might be that the company is not able to reasonably turnaround its financial position.
  • Assess if the safe harbour could apply – A decision to utilise the safe harbour provisions should be taken at Board level. Professional advice should be taken to review eligibility and viability of accessing the safe harbour provisions.
  • Develop a plan – document a plan with measurable and realistic targets. You need to demonstrate that the plan is “reasonably likely to lead to a better outcome” for the company.  Any contracts the company has entered into also need to be reviewed as part of that plan.
  • Measure and adjust – The plan should not only be followed but also regularly assessed and amended where required for changing circumstances. Directors have an obligation to understand the point at which the plan is not working and to work co-operatively with liquidators or administrators.  The safe harbour does not protect directors who do not keep tight controls on the viability of a turnaround plan.  Keep informed and realistically assess the company’s position.

Solvency is an issue that arises for companies of all sizes; particularly those on a fast growth trajectory.  It’s essential that directors have the right information available to them to manage these periods of uncertainty.  Employee and tax payments, and tax reporting should never be missed as these are the first sign of deeper problems and likely to trigger further investigation or audit by the regulators.  If the company needs help, get help.  Hope is not a strategy.